セルロースファイバーマーケット

The secondary research process involved comprehensive analysis of regulatory databases, industry publications, trade association reports, and authoritative forestry & chemical organizations. Key sources included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (for hygiene applications), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), International FAO/UNEP Programme, Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA), Confederation of European Paper Industries (CEPI), International Rayon and Synthetic Fibers Committee (CIRFS), Textile Exchange, National Cotton Council of America, International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Forestry Database, UN Comtrade Database, International Labour Organization (ILO) textile sector data, OECD Trade in Value Added (TiVA) database, Eurostat Comext Database, China National Textile and Apparel Council (CNTAC), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (India), and Brazilian Tree Industry (Ibá). These sources were used to collect production capacity statistics, regulatory compliance data, sustainability certification trends, trade flow analysis, raw material pricing (wood pulp vs. cotton), and market landscape analysis for natural cellulose fibers (viscose, rayon, lyocell, modal) and synthetic alternatives (acetate, triacetate).

Qualitative and quantitative insights were obtained by interviewing supply-side and demand-side stakeholders during the primary research process. CEOs, VPs of Sustainability, pulp procurement managers, and commercial directors from cellulose fiber manufacturers, dissolving pulp mills, and chemical suppliers (carbon disulfide, sodium hydroxide) comprised the supply-side sources. The demand-side sources comprised chief procurement officers from textile brands, R&D executives from nonwoven hygiene product manufacturers, technical directors from industrial filtration companies, and sustainability officers from apparel retailers. The primary research validated fiber production capacities, confirmed biorefinery expansion timelines, and collected insights on the implementation of closed-loop manufacturing, sustainable forestry sourcing strategies, and price volatility management across pulp-fiber value chains.

Primary Respondent Breakdown:

By Designation: C-level Primaries (28%), Director Level (32%), Others (40%)

By Region: North America (28%), Europe (32%), Asia-Pacific (35%), Rest of World (5%)

Global market valuation was derived through production volume analysis and revenue mapping across the value chain. The methodology included:

Identification of 55+ key manufacturers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (China, India, Indonesia, Japan), and Latin America (Brazil, Chile)

Product mapping across natural cellulose fibers (viscose staple fiber, viscose filament yarn, lyocell, modal) and synthetic cellulose fibers (cellulose acetate, cellulose triacetate)

Analysis of dissolving pulp capacity, utilization rates, and integrated vs. non-integrated production models

Coverage of manufacturers representing 75-80% of global cellulose fiber capacity in 2024

Extrapolation using bottom-up (fiber production volume × ASP by fiber type and region) and top-down (manufacturer revenue cross-validation with pulp input costs) approaches to derive segment-specific valuations for textile, hygiene (baby diapers, adult incontinence, feminine care), and industrial (filtration, composites, specialty papers) applications