来源：二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
例如，根据美国能源信息署（EIA，一个负责收集、分析和发布能源信息的美国联邦统计系统）发布的一份报告，2021年，电力行业约占美国天然气总消耗量的37%，而天然气约占美国电力行业主要能源消耗的32%。因此，预计天然气发电用量的增长将推动燃气轮机行业的发展。
此外，随着城市化和工业化进程的推进，以及全球基础设施建设和智能家居建设活动的增加，电力需求也在急剧增长。为了满足这些需求，公共和私营部门都在建设新的发电厂或扩大现有发电厂的产能，这导致这些发电厂对燃气轮机的使用增加，因为它们的危险性较低。这些趋势表明，燃气轮机服务市场将在 2022 年至 2032 年期间实现盈利。
图 1：燃气轮机服务市场（按分销渠道划分），2024 年及以后2032 年（十亿美元）
来源：二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
此外，市场报告中研究的主要国家包括美国、加拿大、德国、法国、英国、意大利、西班牙、中国、日本、印度、澳大利亚、韩国和巴西。
图 2：2022 年各地区燃气轮机服务市场份额（十亿美元）
来源：二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
欧洲燃气轮机服务市场占据第二大市场份额，主要原因是到从燃煤发电到天然气发电的转变。此外，德国燃气轮机服务市场占有最大的市场份额，英国燃气轮机服务市场是欧洲地区增长最快的市场。
预计亚太地区燃气轮机服务市场在 2023 年至 2032 年期间的复合年增长率最高。这是由于该地区石化工业的建立以及丙酮在化学和塑料工业中的使用增加。此外，中国燃气轮机服务市场占有最大的市场份额，印度燃气轮机服务市场是亚太地区增长最快的市场。
本地化生产以最大程度地降低运营成本是燃气轮机服务行业制造商为客户带来利益并扩大市场份额而采用的关键商业策略之一。近年来，燃气轮机服务行业为医学领域带来了一些最重要的优势。燃气轮机服务市场的主要参与者，包括上海电气集团股份有限公司（中国）、MAN SE（德国）、MJB International Limited LLC（迪拜）、MTU Aero Engines AG（德国）、Proenergy Services（美国）等，正试图通过投资研发业务来增加市场需求。
卡特彼勒公司是一家美国建筑设备制造商。该公司是全球最大的建筑设备制造商。卡特彼勒在2018年《财富》美国500强榜单中排名第65位，在2019年《财富》美国500强榜单中排名第238位。卡特彼勒股票是道琼斯工业平均指数的成分股。卡特彼勒公司的历史可以追溯到1925年霍尔特制造公司与C. L. Best拖拉机公司的合并，这导致了总部位于加州的卡特彼勒拖拉机公司的成立。卡特彼勒公司于1986年在特拉华州注册成立。2022年6月，卡特彼勒公司宣布计划将其全球总部从伊利诺伊州迪尔菲尔德迁至德克萨斯州欧文市，并于今年晚些时候开始实施，理由是“出于公司的最佳战略利益”。西门子是一家德国跨国企业集团，也是欧洲最大的工业制造公司。其总部位于慕尼黑，并在多家海外设有分支机构。该公司的主要部门包括数字工业、智能基础设施、移动出行、医疗保健（名为西门子医疗）和金融服务。该公司是一家著名的医疗诊断设备制造商；其医疗保健部门约占总收入的 12%，是该公司继工业自动化部门之后第二大利润部门。它被认为是该领域的先驱和全球收入最高的公司。2020 年 4 月，西门子能源作为西门子能源部门的独立公司成立。新的西门子能源股份公司的股票计划于 9 月 28 日在证券交易所上市交易。
2023年3月，安萨尔多能源公司受ENGIE Produzione委托，负责其位于都灵附近莱尼的联合循环电厂改造项目。该项目涵盖了安萨尔多能源公司正在进行的燃气动力组件升级改造的全面改进。项目将对燃气轮机进行大规模更换，包括发电机组等辅助设备以及所有必要的现场工作。安萨尔多能源公司的贡献包括分别向其提供新型WY23Z发电机和AE 94.3A燃气轮机。对于这次更新工程，2007 年在交钥匙基础上建造的现有工厂是基础。
2022年4月，马来西亚马六甲州亚罗牙也的Edra Energy 2.2吉瓦联合循环发电厂投入使用，该发电厂现已成为马来西亚最大的燃气发电厂。新增装机容量由三台机组组成：一台 GE-9HA.02 燃气轮机、一台 STF-D650 蒸汽轮机、一台 W88 发电机和一台余热蒸汽发生器 (HRSG)。
Técnicas Reunidas 和 TSK 与 Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE) 签订了合同，将于 2022 年 2 月在巴利亚多利德和梅里达建造两座联合循环电厂。
海湾电力公司的发电厂拥有六台 GE 9E 燃气轮机，将由通用电气公司进行升级和维护，正如 2020 年 10 月宣布的那样。该项目的主要目的是提高燃气轮机的可靠性和效率，同时降低维护成本。
What is the projected market valuation of the Gas Turbine Services Market by 2035?
The Gas Turbine Services Market is projected to reach a valuation of 45.16 USD Billion by 2035.
What was the market valuation of the Gas Turbine Services Market in 2024?
In 2024, the Gas Turbine Services Market was valued at 22.17 USD Billion.
What is the expected CAGR for the Gas Turbine Services Market during the forecast period 2025 - 2035?
The expected CAGR for the Gas Turbine Services Market during the forecast period 2025 - 2035 is 6.68%.
Which segment of the Gas Turbine Services Market is projected to have the highest valuation by 2035?
The Heavy Duty segment is projected to reach a valuation of 18.0 USD Billion by 2035.
What are the key service types in the Gas Turbine Services Market?
The key service types include Maintenance & Repair, Overhaul, and Spare Parts Supply, with Maintenance & Repair projected to reach 18.0 USD Billion by 2035.
Which end-user sector is expected to dominate the Gas Turbine Services Market by 2035?
The Power Generation sector is expected to dominate, with a projected valuation of 20.0 USD Billion by 2035.
Who are the leading players in the Gas Turbine Services Market?
What is the projected valuation for the Industrial segment of the Gas Turbine Services Market by 2035?
How does the valuation of the Oil & Gas sector compare to others in the Gas Turbine Services Market by 2035?
What is the projected growth trend for the Aeroderivative segment in the Gas Turbine Services Market?
The secondary research process involved comprehensive analysis of regulatory databases, technical standards repositories, peer-reviewed engineering journals, and authoritative energy industry sources. Key sources included the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Agency (IEA), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), US Department of Energy (DOE) Gas Turbine Program databases, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) certification records, International Air Transport Association (IATA) engine maintenance statistics, VGBE PowerTech (European technical association for power and heat generation), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) technical journals and turbine standards, Gas Turbine World installation databases, World Energy Council power plant asset registers, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) flexibility and grid integration reports, International Energy Forum (IEF) global gas demand datasets, BP Statistical Review of World Energy, International Gas Union (IGU) wholesale gas market reports, Power Engineering International plant databases, European Gas Turbine Association (EGTA) fleet statistics, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) maintenance expenditure filings, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emissions compliance databases for gas-fired assets, Flight Global aviation MRO fleet data, and national energy ministry reports from key markets (India Ministry of Power, China National Energy Administration, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Energy). These sources were used to collect installed capacity data, fleet aging statistics, Long-Term Service Agreement (LTSA) filings, emissions retrofit requirements, outage duration benchmarks, and maintenance expenditure trends for heavy-duty gas turbines, aeroderivatives, and industrial turbines.
To gather both qualitative and quantitative insights, supply-side and demand-side stakeholders were interviewed during the primary research phase. Supply-side sources included independent service providers (ISPs) like Wood Group, EthosEnergy, and Sulzer; component suppliers (blade, combustor, and hot gas path specialists); aftermarket parts distributors; and CEOs, VPs of Service Operations, Chief Technology Officers, regulatory compliance heads, and commercial directors from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) like GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi Power. Demand-side sources included asset management heads from district energy and industrial cogeneration facilities, fleet managers from aviation lessors, procurement leads from combined cycle power plant operators, chief operating officers and plant managers from independent power producers (IPPs) and electric utilities, and maintenance directors from oil & gas supermajors and pipeline operators. Primary research confirmed Long-Term Service Agreement (LTSA) renewal timelines, validated market segmentation by service type (maintenance vs. overhaul cycles), and collected data on fleet modernization decisions, digital MRO adoption rates, and the transition from OEM dependence to independent service providers.
Primary Respondent Breakdown:
By Designation: C-level Primaries (30%), Director Level (32%), Others (38%)
By Region: North America (32%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (33%), Rest of World (10%)
Global market valuation was derived through service contract value mapping and installed base analysis. The methodology included:
Identification of 50+ key service providers and OEMs across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America
Service mapping across maintenance (routine/periodic), repair (minor/major), overhaul (minor/major), and spare parts supply categories
Turbine type classification across heavy-duty (>100 MW), aeroderivative (aviation-derived), and industrial (mechanical drive/cogeneration) segments
Analysis of reported and modeled annual service revenues specific to gas turbine maintenance portfolios, including Long-Term Service Agreements (LTSAs) and ad-hoc repair contracts
Coverage of service providers and OEMs representing 75-80% of global market share in 2024
Extrapolation using bottom-up (installed base × maintenance cost per fired hour × annual operating hours by country) and top-down (service provider revenue validation) approaches to derive segment-specific valuations for OEM vs. independent service provider channels, heavy-duty vs. aeroderivative fleets, and power generation vs. oil & gas end-use applications
请填写以下表格以获取本报告的免费样本
“This is really good guys. Excellent work on a tight deadline. I will continue to use you going forward and recommend you to others. Nice job”
“Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”
“Thanks for sending the report it gives us a good global view of the Betaïne market.”
“Thank you, this will be very helpful for OQS.”
“We found the report very insightful! we found your research firm very helpful. I'm sending this email to secure our future business.”
“I am very pleased with how market segments have been defined in a relevant way for my purposes (such as "Portable Freezers & refrigerators" and "last-mile"). In general the report is well structured. Thanks very much for your efforts.”
“I have been reading the first document or the study, ,the Global HVAC and FP market report 2021 till 2026. Must say, good info! I have not gone in depth at all parts, but got a good indication of the data inside!”
“We got the report in time, we really thank you for your support in this process. I also thank to all of your team as they did a great job.”
