全球连续油管市场概览:
p2021 年连续油管市场规模价值 31.8 亿美元。预计连续油管行业将从 2022 年的 33.5 亿美元增长到 2030 年的 58.8 亿美元,预测期内(2022 - 2030 年)的复合年增长率 (CAGR) 为 6.11%。由于对井下作业的需求不断增长,预计连续油管市场在预测期内将出现显着增长。上游企业不断努力提高成熟油田的产量,推动了连续油管行业的发展。
来源:二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
连续油管市场趋势
ul-
油井干预作业需求的不断增长将推动市场增长
-
勘探和生产活动增加,尤其是在海上油田,影响勘探和生产运营商寻找新油田的主要驱动因素包括勘探技术的进步、浅水区石油储量的减少以及勘探作业的经济可行性。因此,连续油管将拥有更多机会。
连续油管市场细分洞察:
连续油管服务类型洞察
根据服务类型,市场细分包括油井干预、钻井和其他。由于老旧油井数量的增加,油井干预业务在2021年占据了连续油管收入的大部分份额。油井干预部分分为完井、油井清洁和其他,包括油井穿孔、油井增产、泵送和循环。
连续油管应用洞察
根据应用,市场细分为陆上和海上。陆上部分在 2021 年占据了市场主导地位。这是由于使用较小的服务钻机和移动式、自给式连续油管钻机进行轻型作业。此外,页岩气勘探的兴起(尤其是在美国)以及钻井活动的增加估计将推动全球陆上应用的增长。
图 2:2021 年和 2022 年按应用划分的连续油管市场2030 年(十亿美元)
来源:二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
连续油管区域洞察
按地区划分,该研究提供了对北美、欧洲、亚太地区和世界其他地区的市场洞察。预计北美将在 2018 年至 2023 年期间成为最大的市场,这得益于美国和加拿大非常规资源的增长。此外,墨西哥湾和美国其他海上油田对连续油管作业的需求预计将推动市场增长。
图 3:2021 年各地区连续油管市场份额 (%)
来源:二手资料研究、一手资料研究、MRFR 数据库和分析师评论
预计亚太地区的复合年增长率将有所增长。印度、越南和中国等发展中国家对该地区石油和天然气的需求正在迅速扩大。该地区的国家正在开发油田。
预计欧洲地区将以显著的速度增长。该地区的能源平衡正在从化石燃料转向可再生能源。此外,俄乌战争对该地区的天然气供应以及连续油管行业的趋势和前景产生了不利影响。
连续油管主要市场参与者及竞争洞察
主要市场参与者正在投入大量资金进行研发,以扩展其产品线,这将进一步刺激市场增长。随着新产品发布、合同协议、并购、增加投资以及与其他组织的合作等重大市场发展,市场参与者也在开展各种战略活动以扩大其影响力。为了在竞争日益激烈且不断发展的市场环境中成长和发展,连续油管行业的竞争对手必须提供价格合理的产品。
在当地生产以降低运营成本是连续油管行业制造商用来造福客户和扩大市场部门的主要商业策略之一。市场最近赋予了医药一些最重要的优势。包括斯伦贝谢、哈里伯顿、威德福、贝克休斯、通用电气公司等在内的主要市场参与者正试图通过资助研发计划来增加市场需求。
贝克休斯是一家能源技术企业,为能源和工业客户提供解决方案。提供评估、钻井、完井、生产和优化等油田服务,以及压力控制设备和服务、海底生产系统和服务、钻井设备和柔性管道系统等油田设备。
此外,该公司还提供涡轮机械和工艺解决方案,如驱动器、压缩机、交钥匙解决方案、泵、阀门、压缩天然气 (CNG) 和小型液化天然气 (LNG) 解决方案,以及数字解决方案,如状态监测、工业控制、无损技术、测量、传感和管道解决方案。
哈里伯顿是一家能源相关产品和服务供应商。它分为两个部分:完井和生产以及钻井和评估。完井和生产部门提供固井、增产、干预、压力控制、专用化学品、人工举升和完井产品和服务。
钻井与评估部门为客户提供油田和油藏建模、钻井、评估和井筒布置解决方案,以模拟和测量施工作业。
市场上的主要公司包括
- 斯伦贝谢
- 哈里伯顿
- 威瑟福德
- 贝克休斯
- 通用电气公司
- 纳博斯工业有限公司
- CJ 能源服务公司
- Cafrac 油井服务公司Ltd
- RPC Inc
- Step Energy Services Ltd
连续油管行业发展
2022 年 5 月:哈里伯顿宣布在其位于路易斯安那州的新伊比利亚培训基地安装大型连续油管干预系统。该系统集成了哈里伯顿的 V135HP 连续油管注入器、可容纳 36,000 英尺 2-3/8 英寸连续油管的卷筒以及承重 750 吨的张力升降架,是迄今为止部署的最大、最强大、最坚固的系统。
2022 年 12 月: 贝克休斯于 3 月宣布拟收购油井专家 Altus,接管该公司的 1,200 名员工,其中包括位于阿伯丁附近波特利森的 500 多名员工。
连续油管市场细分
连续油管服务类型展望
- 油井干预
- 钻井
- 其他
连续油管管材应用展望
- 陆上
- 离岸
连续油管区域展望
- 北美
- 美国
- 加拿大
- 欧洲
- 德国
- 法国
- 英国
- 意大利
- 西班牙
- 其余部分欧洲
- 亚太地区
- 中国
- 日本
- 印度
- 澳大利亚
- 韩国
- 澳大利亚
- 亚太地区其他地区
- 世界其他地区
- 中东
- 非洲
- 拉丁美洲
FAQs
What is the projected market valuation of the Coiled Tubing Market by 2035?
The Coiled Tubing Market is projected to reach a valuation of 7.242 USD Billion by 2035.
What was the market valuation of the Coiled Tubing Market in 2024?
In 2024, the Coiled Tubing Market had a valuation of 3.772 USD Billion.
What is the expected CAGR for the Coiled Tubing Market during the forecast period 2025 - 2035?
The expected CAGR for the Coiled Tubing Market during the forecast period 2025 - 2035 is 6.11%.
Which companies are considered key players in the Coiled Tubing Market?
Key players in the Coiled Tubing Market include Schlumberger, Halliburton, Baker Hughes, and Weatherford International.
What are the main service types in the Coiled Tubing Market and their valuations?
The main service types include Well Intervention, valued at 3.0 USD Billion, and Drilling, valued at 3.5 USD Billion.
How does the onshore application segment compare to the offshore segment in terms of market valuation?
The onshore application segment is valued at 4.363 USD Billion, whereas the offshore segment is valued at 2.879 USD Billion.
What is the valuation of the 'Others' segment in the Coiled Tubing Market?
The 'Others' segment in the Coiled Tubing Market is valued at 0.742 USD Billion.
What trends are influencing the growth of the Coiled Tubing Market?
The growth of the Coiled Tubing Market appears to be influenced by advancements in drilling technologies and increasing demand for efficient well intervention services.
What is the projected growth for the drilling segment in the Coiled Tubing Market?
The drilling segment is projected to grow to 3.5 USD Billion by 2035.
How does the Coiled Tubing Market's growth potential compare to other segments?
The Coiled Tubing Market's growth potential, particularly in the drilling and well intervention segments, suggests a robust future, likely outpacing other segments.
Research Approach
Secondary Research
The secondary research process involved comprehensive analysis of regulatory databases, aviation industry publications, technical standards, and authoritative aerospace organizations. Key sources included the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), International Air Transport Association (IATA), Airports Council International (ACI), Military Aviation Authority (MAA - UK), US Department of Defense (DoD) Aviation Safety Reports, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) aviation weather databases, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chemical safety regulations, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) REACH regulations, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) workplace safety standards, SAE International (aerospace standards), ASTM International (material standards), US Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Eurostat Transport Database, World Bank aviation infrastructure data, and OECD transport statistics. These sources were used to collect flight operation statistics, de-icing fluid certification data, safety incident reports, climate pattern analysis, airport infrastructure data, military aviation protocols, regulatory compliance requirements, and competitive landscape analysis for ethylene glycol-based fluids, propylene glycol-based fluids, Type I, Type II, and Type IV de-icing fluids.
Primary Research
Qualitative and quantitative insights were obtained by interviewing supply-side and demand-side stakeholders during the primary research process. Supply-side sources comprised CEOs, VPs of Operations, regulatory compliance chiefs, and commercial directors from aviation chemical suppliers, ground support equipment OEMs, and de-icing fluid manufacturers. Airport operations managers, ground handling service directors, MRO facility managers, fleet maintenance chiefs from commercial airlines, military aviation logistics officers, and procurement leads from airport authorities and defense agencies constituted demand-side sources. The market segmentation was validated, the product development timelines were confirmed, and insights were gathered on operational adoption patterns, procurement strategies, pricing dynamics, and seasonal demand fluctuations from primary research.
Primary Respondent Breakdown:
By Designation: C-level Primaries (32%), Director Level (31%), Others (37%)
By Region: North America (32%), Europe (30%), Asia-Pacific (28%), Rest of World (10%)
Market Size Estimation
Global market valuation was derived through revenue mapping and de-icing operation volume analysis. The methodology included:
Identification of over 50 significant manufacturers and service providers in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa
Product mapping for the Type I, Type II, and Type IV fluid categories, as well as for ethylene glycol-based fluids and propylene glycol-based fluids
Examination of annual revenues that are specific to aircraft deicing portfolios, as reported and modeled
Coverage of manufacturers and service providers representing 75-80% of global market share in 2024
Extrapolation using bottom-up (aircraft movements × de-icing events × fluid volume × ASP by country) and top-down (manufacturer revenue validation) approaches to derive segment-specific valuations
请填写以下表格以获取本报告的免费样本
Customer Stories
“This is really good guys. Excellent work on a tight deadline. I will continue to use you going forward and recommend you to others. Nice job”
“Thanks. It’s been a pleasure working with you, please use me as reference with any other Intel employees.”
“Thanks for sending the report it gives us a good global view of the Betaïne market.”
“Thank you, this will be very helpful for OQS.”
“We found the report very insightful! we found your research firm very helpful. I'm sending this email to secure our future business.”
“I am very pleased with how market segments have been defined in a relevant way for my purposes (such as "Portable Freezers & refrigerators" and "last-mile"). In general the report is well structured. Thanks very much for your efforts.”
“I have been reading the first document or the study, ,the Global HVAC and FP market report 2021 till 2026. Must say, good info! I have not gone in depth at all parts, but got a good indication of the data inside!”
“We got the report in time, we really thank you for your support in this process. I also thank to all of your team as they did a great job.”